JB/034/194/001

Click Here To Edit

1823. Octr 19

Constitutional Code. or Procedure 1. Enactive PartRatiocinate

Ch. Quasi-Jury
1. App function
§.

III. Rationale. Quasi-jury part.

Question Why are the cases of Judicial-rapacity officers admitt
of Appeal?

Question Why not admitt of Appeal without a warrant
from a Quasi Jury?

To these two questions thus connected, in
separate answer can conveniently be given.

Reasons

1. Appeal is eventually allowed, best if to a single Judge without
any presumptively contracting Jury the piece of aflicting punishment
to such a extent price, the security against endeavour
and oppression should be regarded as notinsufficient sufficiently
strong.

2. The faculty of giving effect to the Appeal or
to the d inclined of being left as in the cases withoutunrespected
restraint in the hands of the individual is lodged in the hands
of the Quasi Jury because if lodged in the hands of the
individual delay visitor and pecuniary expence, in
increases quantity would be the same result: to
a great extent, namely by by means of disolution in cases where the expence of ant
fell upon individuals by also to cases indist amount.
Of the individual cases in which crimes of this class are prosecuted
for scarcely in a out of a hundred is the defendant
a person altogether innocent: in the other 99 his is reallyguilty
however in a certain proportion of them by one means
or other he makes his escape from conviction.

Identifier: | JB/034/194/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.
Date_1	1823-10-19	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	034	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	194	Info in main headings field	constitutional code procedures ratiocinative part
Image	001	Titles	rationale - quasi jury part
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c1 / e1
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	10468
Box Contents