xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/034/252/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1823. Decr. 28 Revised 1824 March 21
Constitutional Code

This, after the Checks applied to the other functionaries have
been enumerated This is rather the mode of calling the checks not
action. Confer Ch. XI Judiciary

§. Checks

Art. 8. Follows, as which as to undue delay, not a check
Art. 8. If done in a not applicable to the case of an Immediate Judicatory. If within a certain length of time which the legis
in regard relation to which the Legislature will make Procedure book
after receipt of the record at the Appellate Judicatory, no
make provision according to to wh circumstances, nothing Appeal has by the Appellate Judicatory been pronounced no decision
has the Appellate Judicatory been pronounced on the
subject of the Appeal,
the decrees of the Immediate Judicatory
are thereupon understood to be confirmed: and the after mention receipt
made notice given of the lapse of the interval to the Registrar of the
Appellate Judicatory it belongs to remitt fthe record to the and time due time to wit 7 days,
Registrar of the for inhibition therefrom to the Immediate Judicatory, to the end that if no such inhibition has been received execution
may forthwith have has place.

Art. 9. If So, if in the meantime petition publickly made application for argumentation
has been made to the Appellate Judge Appellate by a party
on either side, and the faculty of argumentation has been
refused; or namely directly or virtually, by non-appointment
of time day and hour, or omission by omitting to
hear argumentation according to after appointment entry to the
Registrar it belongs to make entry thereof on the record, antecedently
to retransmission as aforesaid made as above.

Art. 10. If after So, if to application thus publickly begun to be
made, the Judge Appellate should refuse ulterior audience. this Such
would be an offence refusal would moreover be a punishable offence: and may might be denounced
as such to the Justice Minister and thereby to the Public Opinion Tribunal, to pave the way for eventual dislocation at the
hands of the authority
as per Ch. X. §.


Identifier: | JB/034/252/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.

Date_1

1823-12-28

Marginal Summary Numbering

8-10

Box

034

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

252

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d21 / e3

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1823

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

admiral pavel chichagov

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1823

Notes public

"revised 1824 march 21"

ID Number

10526

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk