★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
1823. Decr. 28 Revised 1824 March 21
Constitutional Code
☞ This, after the Checks applied to the other functionaries have
been enumerated This is rather the mode of calling the checks not
action. Confer Ch. XI Judiciary
§. Checks
Art. 8. Follows, as which as to undue delay, not a check
Art. 8. If done in a not applicable to the case of an Immediate Judicatory. If within a certain length of time which the legis
in regard relation to which the Legislature will make Procedure book after receipt of the record at the Appellate Judicatory, no
make provision according to to wh circumstances, nothing Appeal has by the Appellate Judicatory been pronounced no decision
has the Appellate Judicatory been pronounced on the
subject of the Appeal, the decrees of the Immediate Judicatory
are thereupon understood to be confirmed: and the after mention receipt
made notice given of the lapse of the interval to the Registrar of the
Appellate Judicatory it belongs to remitt fthe record to the and time due time to wit 7 days,
Registrar of the for inhibition therefrom to the Immediate Judicatory, to the end that if no such inhibition has been received execution
may forthwith have has place.
Art. 9. If So, if in the meantime petition publickly made application for argumentation
has been made to the Appellate Judge Appellate by a party
on either side, and the faculty of argumentation has been
refused; or namely directly or virtually, by non-appointment
of time day and hour, or omission by omitting to
hear argumentation according to after appointment entry to the
Registrar it belongs to make entry thereof on the record, antecedently
to retransmission as aforesaid made as above.
Art. 10. If after So, if to application thus publickly begun to be
made, the Judge Appellate should refuse ulterior audience. this Such
would be an offence refusal would moreover be a punishable offence: and may might be denounced
as such to the Justice Minister and thereby to the Public Opinion Tribunal, to pave the way for eventual dislocation at the
hands of the authority as per Ch. X. §.
Identifier: | JB/034/252/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 34.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
1823-12-28 |
8-10 |
||
034 |
constitutional code |
||
252 |
constitutional code |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d21 / e3 |
||
jeremy bentham |
j whatman turkey mill 1823 |
||
admiral pavel chichagov |
|||
1823 |
|||
"revised 1824 march 21" |
10526 |
||