JB/035/033/001

Click Here To Edit

Probity in a Judge is no otherwise farther of use than in
as far as it helps contributes to insure rectitude
of decision: inprobity, no otherwise than of dissension
no otherwise than in as far as it has the contrary
effect. The duty of a Judge judging on the question of
fact is to decide according to the evidence. Being Not
a Judge only and not a legislator he has nothing
to do with the propriety of the law. If there be
any instances in which a Judge is habitually
by the influence of any principle in the practice of deciding contrary to the evidence
that Judge shows himself radically unfit for the
exercise of his function: whether the principle that
governs him determines his conduct be termed improbity or
corruption, or by any name or less obnoxious
name is but a question of words. Let it be humanity
love of liberty, piety, call it by any other still
more reputable name if you can find one, the
effect in this point of view is just the same.

Many are the principles which apply themselves which principles
either separately or in conjunction which on the part of a Jury a verdict Judge a ver
decision on a question of fact contrary to the truth
wage war against the probity of a Judge of the case: humanity showing itself in the shape of

Identifier: | JB/035/033/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 35.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	14-16
Box	035	Main Headings	constitutional code; evidence; procedure code
Folio number	033	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f15 / f16
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	l munn
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	benjamin constant
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	10626
Box Contents