★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
1822 Aug. 28
Constitut. Code
In the a case such the one thus described corruption might
without impropriety be said to have had place: in it may
be seen sacrifice detriment produced to the universal interest,
for setting aside the detriment done to the interest of the foreign
community, here may be seen detriment to the interest of the
community in question by means of the detriment evil which
the foreign community thus injured could not if composed
of men fail to do to the community in question in retribution
for the acts of piracy exercised as above at the expence,
here is may be seen benefit rendered to a particular interest, the interest of
the chief in question, at the expence and by the sacrifice as above of that same
universal interest, benefit namely rendered to the interest
of the chief to the amount of the property so captured
that same property or the produce of it when sold placed
at the disposal of the that same chief by the adjudication pronounced
by that same Judge. Here may be seen the Judge corrupted
by the Chief, here may be seen the Chief corrupting
the Judge by the applying to him this temptation by affording
him this inducement to give the colour and effect of
legal jid judicature to those several acts of piracy: here may be
seen the Judge corrupted accordingly on the occasion in question by suffering his
conduct his judicial conduct his judicial conduct in the exercise
of his judicial office to be effectually wrought upon by
this temptation – to be determined by this inducement.
But supposing an effect of this sort stated as having had
corruption for its cause the sort of inducement which the word
corruption would present to the mind of a hearer or a reader
would much more probably be of the nature of good than of the
nature of evil – of the attorney, think of the intimidative hand,
and this – party because the changes produced in the mind in the
moral character of the Judge would not be so clearly entitled to the
appellative of a bad one in the case of his having on the occasion of the making of it been determined
by the fear of a portion of the modes of evil in the shape of death, as if by the hope of the a
portion of the matter of good: for example a share in the proceeds of the mass of the matter of good so acquired in the way of practical deprecation: partly because in
quantity portion of the matter of good is with less hazard of exacting disaffection
and resistance on the part of subjects put into the pocket of a Judge
than a musquet employed in shooting him or a in calling his .
Identifier: | JB/036/193/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 36.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
1822-08-28 |
11-12 |
||
036 |
constitutional code |
||
193 |
constitut. code |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
c3 |
||
jeremy bentham |
c wilmott 1819 |
||
andreas louriottis |
|||
1819 |
|||
11117 |
|||