xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/039/106/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1824. April 13
Constitutional Code.

8. If instead of money power, the benefit which the rejection would the rejection would in proposed to be conferred by the rejection
the comparatively small number in question the rejection confer were composed of money alone on imposed on the comparatively
small number in question at the expence of all – were composed of
money, the inequality and injustice of it would be manifest to all eyes.
be manifest. The tax which in case of the rejection in this case would
be necessary to replace come instead of the saving, call it for example
£200,000 a year. What could anyone find to say
on behalf of a tax to any such amount, imposed for no other purpose
that to raise a sum to be distributed a than that of distributing the produce of it
among a certain set of candidates for office?

9. Suppose no saving then indeed the objection would be
not only reasonable but conclusive. But the saving is of the
very essence of the measure and inseparable from it.

9. So would above that of the pecuniary saving, in the sacrifice 9. The saving (supposed) rejected, in addition to the sacrifice in money
which in letters in this next most opulent class into to participate forget not note the sacrifice in aptitude.
with the more opulent class, or that of the sacrifice in the
shape of aptitude.
Proportioned, as above, to the money they
give for the situation, is the probative force of the evidence which
given by
which the more opulent class give of their relish for the occupations.
Let in those who will give nothing for it those same occupations, nor
will enter upon it them unless the emolument remains unreduced.
You let in a set of men to every one of whom the occupation
may be an object of aversion, the correspondent repulsion
being but just barely surmounted by the attraction produced by
the relief to indigence.


Identifier: | JB/039/106/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 39.

Date_1

1824-04-13

Marginal Summary Numbering

not numbered

Box

039

Main Headings

constitutional code

Folio number

106

Info in main headings field

constitutional code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

j whatman turkey mill 1824

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

jonathan blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

12113

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk