xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/041/044/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

'Click Here To Edit

1825. Nov. 27 28. 1826 Nov. 4
Constitutional Code. Copied and Copy corrected.
Ch. Judge Deputes permanent
§. 2. Relation to Judge

Enactive, Ratiocinative and Instructional
Art. 12. After As case where the Suit is commenced
before the Judge principal, so case where it is
commenced before a Judge Depute permanent that the suit has been commenced, after the original
enquiry or say examination, as a recapitulatory enquiry or say
examination
will have place, in any of the cases mentioned
in Ch. XVI. Quasi-Jury. §. 1. 1.Fields of Service. In that case to On this occasion obviation second enquiry the Judge should in general be the same as on
that the benefit the advantage afforded by the of
of evidence resulting from the presentation of the evidence which the first: because to any second Judge the evidence, that had
from the presenting to the mind of the Judge on the second examination in a shape inferior less apt been checked on the first enquiry can not otherwise present other itself in the most apt shape.
be itself apt to the best the condition in which it by the first situation being the
Judge by whom be recapitulatory enquiry as is taken be the Judge
Depute permanent before by whom the original examination
was likewise that if for
Nevertheless for preponderant reasons assigned, the the Judge
Depute permanent may, on this occasion, of his own motion, transmitt the demand recapitulatory
examination enquiry from himself to the Judge principal, who in this such
case will either perform the enquiry himself, or transmitt it to some
other one of his Judge Deputes permanent: and without assigned
any party may
on the application of any party,
with or without reason assigned, it will in like manner
be transmitted to the Judge principal. But, in this case, it
will be for the Judge principal to consider, whether it the application had not
for the express purpose for its cause that a hope entertained, of the deception, capable of being produced
by the exhibition of comparatively unapt shape of
the first edition of the evidence, and if yes, to declare such his opinion or
suspicion, and act accordingly on the occasion of his decrees.


Identifier: | JB/041/044/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41.

Date_1

1825-11-27

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

041

Main Headings

Constitutional Code

Folio number

044

Info in main headings field

Constitutional Code

Image

001

Titles

Enactive - Ratiocinative and Instructional

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.

Page Numbering

D6 / E5

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

[[notes_public::Copied and Copy corrected [note in Bentham's hand]]]

ID Number

001

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk