★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
1824. Feby. March 1
Constitutional CodeCopied
Ch. Appellate Judges
§. 2. Field of Service.
§. 2. Field of Service.
Art. 1. Coincident with that of an Immediate Art. 1. Of the service of an Appellate Judicatory the local
field includes in it that the field of a service of those of
a certain number of Immediate Judicatories: the field of the service of which It
the local are namely so many Voting Districts stiled Sub-Districts. In
coincides extent it coincides with that with that of an Election District or with that of thein
the entire fields of number of aggregate extent it coincides with one or more other Election Districts.
Art. 2. Of the service of an Appellate Judicatory So
the logical field: also coincides with that of an Immediate
Judicatory: except in so far as it may be regarded
as being narrowed modified by the provisions contained
in the three this and the five ensuing Sections.
Art. 3. )Except in so far as in this Chapter is attributed to it) To are no Appellate Judicatory belongs
not any Im immediate Jurisdiction.
Art. 4. For As between Im One Immediate judicatory and
another within his District, a Judge Appellate exercises the jurisdiction-adjustive
function, as per Ch. XXII. Justice-Minister.
(a) To prevent useless and mischievous complication, Appeal-Districts
should coincide with Election-Districts. But,
for accuracy and other purposes convenience in other respects, Election Districts in any
number might be included in one and the same
Appellate Appeal District, On the one hand indeed the advantage from
the difference of instruction in matters of Judicature would in
so far indeed be narrowed: but on the other hand the matter cases of in an Appellate Judicatory the extent of this this
an Appellate Judicatory those advantages is not of instruction in this shape such field of this instruction being very narrow in comparison
under those Costs be the not being of what it is in an Appellate Judicatory. It is confined to what may
never various and difference. In be afforded by the matter of a record together with the argumentation grounded on it
Judicatory what it has for its subject matter that same matter evidence in an Appellate Judicatory no evidence been and nothing else:
it includes not the examination of witnesses, nor the arrangements for securing
received from the matter of witnesses execution and effect to decrees;
and for that purpose for securing the efficiency of the system means employed for the necessary communication: namely between person and persons, between persons and things, and between things and things.
In the Metropolis would be the most enlightened public; the
most serviceable intelligent Quasi Jury, and body of Judiciary Visitors. What extra
use it might be of advantage to make of the Metropolis in the character of as the seat
of an Appellate Judicatory,
would depend upon circumstances
of a local nature,
not within the cognizance of
the author of this proposed Code.
Identifier: | JB/041/330/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 41.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
1824-03-01 |
1-4 |
||
041 |
Constitutional Code |
||
330 |
Constitutional Code |
||
001 |
|||
Text sheet |
1 |
||
"Recto" is not in the list (recto, verso) of allowed values for the "Rectoverso" property.
|
D2 / E1 |
||
[[notes_public::Copd [note not in Bentham's hand]]] |
001 |
||