xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/054/057/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1824. Decr. 11
Procedure Code Ch. Nomenclature

35. Attendance. 36. Contestation. On the alternatives
given as above between non compliance with its attendant suffering
and attendance with compliance, the positive course being by
the supposition chosen embraced forthcomingness at the time appointed
at the judgment seat Justice Chamber is the result, and that forthcomingness
in that place is termed attendance. It Person attending
attendant – say the being to make this the simplest case – the
defendant himself.

With this attendance comes now by the supposition contestation.
On the occasion The Defendant whether he will generally speaking become applicant
in his – applicant for him to do whatever happens to be
in his power to do towards invalidating the claim showing upon his situation that the
obligation of performing the clear terms directed by the suit does not
attach.

Whether he be or be not counter-applicant, the Defendant
will now be interrogated – doubly interrogated – interrogated
not only as the applicant was by the Judge, but by the applicant
likewise. This second interrogation performed with for an adverse purpose,
this second interrogation may be termed will have the effect of had any kind tendency, and more or less of the effect of and may therefore receive the name of contestation justice:
the defendant may as on the former occasion so in the present, the
Defendant may to this account be termed an interrogation(a) (a) ☞ Insert here at an entered period?.
In which mode so ever Whether it be spontaneously or by extraction (say for shortness
extractedly) delivered the evidence thus given delivered by the Defendant,
opposed opposite as it is to its to that delivered at the initiatory
hearing by the applicant, may be termed counterevidence: and if
in so far as it is regarded as being as extended by his probation
it will be counterproof.

Not content with this, he will of course be turning again upon
his adversary his con adverse interrogation, and plying him with
interrogations in his turn plying with interrogations the party
who he beholds the source of the vexation he is experiencing
he will act in the character of counter interrogator, placing his adversary
in the correspondent and opposite situation of counter-interrogatore..


Identifier: | JB/054/057/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 54.

Date_1

1824-12-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

70-74

Box

054

Main Headings

procedure code

Folio number

057

Info in main headings field

extracted from procedure code

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c16

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17576

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk