xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/054/200/001

Jump to: navigation, search
In progress. Last edited by Kdownunder

Click Here To Edit

1823. Novr.
Constitutional Code.

This

In Bonaparte's Code, the idea of conciliation is brought
to view. To one of his judicatures, the function of conciliation
is professed to be attached: namely that of the Justice of Peace
though under the title as denominated no intention of any such
function is to be found. Litigation is a bad thing practice: impose
and you check it. Reconciliation is a good thing: benevolent
function: how are a Judges a Minister of Justice has an
be employed than in the exercise of it.
Sources and of delusion both these observations: employed
by lawyercraft to blind the multitude and reconcile them
to depredation and oppression. Of the expression notion that
litigation is beneficially repressed by taxes the delusiveness
has been exposed elsewhere.

A judicator an instrument of Reconciliation indeed? Suppose the parties disposed to it.
In the breasts of the parties suppose any such thing as a disposition
towards the desirable state of things there mentioned, no
need have they of the power of a Judge: of he who seems
invites the adverse party to a meeting for this purpose
in the presence of a Judge might as well give
to
propose a meeting without any such oppressor than
person, and with as much time for it as they can
mutually desire agree in desiring: if a third person must be added
better if possible common friend, or if the such an arbiter
can not be obtained a stranger to both parties.
Of such a meeting the alledged use is to receive from the Judge an opinion –
the result But the of an exercise of the his function. The party
who is by it does not acquiesce in it: why should
he? what inducement or to do ? : if to
decree the Judge in this as in other cases could
and subjoin a correspondent imperative decree. But he was had
he that power, the Judicator
would not be the one in
in question. It would not
in a Reconciliation Court:
it would be an ordinary Court of Justice.


Identifier: | JB/054/200/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 54.

Date_1

1823-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

054

Main Headings

constitutional code; procedure code

Folio number

200

Info in main headings field

constitutional code bonaparte

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

d8 / e1?

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

17719

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk