xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/055/076/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1823. Novr.
Constitutional Code

Art. 7. Exception 2. Proposed pursuer under Guardianship.
In this case the Judge, antecedently to summation or prehension
as will require require his attendance might accordingly
will, if it appear to him that in respect of age and the circumstances condition in life is capable of
furnishing material information require his attendance, otherwise
not.

Art. 8. Exception 3. Proposed pursuer incapacitated from
attendance by bodily infirmity bodily or mental.
In this case the Judge will may either dispense with his attendance
during the continuance of the incapacity, or under visitation
of him on the spot. As to such vis whether to under such
visitation, he will be determined by the joint consideration
of the importance of the cause of suit, and the probable materiality
of such information evidence as could no otherwise be extracted
from the party's own mouth: namely the importance materiality of
its being extracted received in this stage of the cau suit and
instead of waiting till after the proposed defendant has been
examined.

Art. 9. Exception 4. The suit either purely public. or
publico-private
In this case the only person capable of acting
in the character of pursuer is the Agent of Government – the
Pursuer General. But in this case, unless by mere accident
nothing of the facts belonging to the case – of the facts on which the
demand is grounded can have come within the immediate and
personal cognizance of him the functionary who acts on the pursuer's side.
On the information received from some person at large to whose
cognizance some such fact has come, or by whose information can
can be given leading to the discovery of such percipient witness must
in proceeding in the first instance be grounded. To the Pursuer General
may the information in such case be indeed delivered. But so likewise
may it to the Judge: and not only as well but better may
it pass immediately to the Judge, rather in the shape of immediate
evidence rather than inclined of being through the mouth as per of the in the shape of hearing evidence.
☞ Add the case of publico-private offences & suits.


Identifier: | JB/055/076/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.

Date_1

1823-11

Marginal Summary Numbering

7-9

Box

055

Main Headings

Constitutional Code; Procedure Code

Folio number

076

Info in main headings field

Constitutional Code

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

E3

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1822

Marginals

Jeremy Bentham

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1822

Notes public

ID Number

17797

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk