★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
1825. April 2
Copied Mgent
Apr. 17.
I & IV
Ch. IX
S. Defence how procurable
II. Mode
III Judicative
III Mode
Instructions Instructing?
Art.1. Between Judge and individual part the advantageousness of
operated upon by him, modes of cau
two - 1. mutual presence mode
2. mutual distance mode
2
Art. 2. On the mere difference between presence
and non protions for the most part
|
part the advantageousness of
the oral musical presence mode: to wit no
respect of the direct mode of justice
on the length of the distance turn
the proportionable advantage
ness of the epistolary mode:
to wit in respect of the collateral ends
because in case of distance
to bring about the incident
presence mode with its
advantages requires two
Art.1. Bet Judge
and individual ordinary modus
of
1.
journey with intervening
present the
demonstrating; with
correspondent delay: and
2. Interlocutors not
with expence and vexation
present signs prment
as a danage proposed
mode apartrary
to length of terms,
as a journey, to length of
time, and besides to length
distance.
3
Art.2 On distance
between
non presence,
and in case of new
-presence byon the length
of distance home
chiefly the difference
as to clgilatates as a ness
3
Art 3. For the advantages
from presence
see Ch. VI. Jud. Appl
S. Urda oral. They
apply to both ends of
Justice Contiguity of
the individuals abide to
the Judges station was
there supposed. But,
of these advantages, cases reaching such converse or in large proportion deprived by the nature of changes.
Art 11. Whatsoever be the relation situation of the
individual pursuer defendant or witness for holdingcommencing
and maintaining intercourse with him there will be in every secure the two modes of
the oral and the bolary: courses by evanescent signs
converse by durable permanent signs.
4
Art.4. To contiguity substitute
distance, thereupon
to produce presence comes
need of journey by individual
to Justice Chamber:
maximum of length
not less than the earths
semicircumference,
with the addition produced
by turnings and windings
In point of eligibility, relation law to for the purposes here in
question the difference forms upon the difference to have presence
and difference distance non-presence in between the Judge and the individual
who for the purpose of the suit as in reasons prescribed
by him to hold converse with him.
Of the use advantage which resultingdesirable from the stance
of mutual pursuer the particular have been
brought to view. See Ch.VI Jud. Appl. They The advantage place with reference
to both ends of justice the direct and the collateral: they are
conducive to rectitude of decision, and to minimization
delay vexation and expence: abng, This in the supposition
that the of the individual is, to practical purpose
contiguous to the abode judicial abode of the Judge
But whom instead of this contiguity the case exhibits
mutual remoteness - ness to the degree of which there were
no limits other than those by the length of the
cath more than half the ca circumference, through
senses in the alternative between journey on the part of the
individual for the purpose of effecting the desirable requisite presence
and converse at a distance: but in no other mode than
the epistolary does the nature of things admitt increase between
any two persons, otherwise than by the intervention of an intermediate Juryman a mode of increase which
under the same nature
as in its nature widely
difference and to purposes such as those in question altogether inadequate
|
Identifier: | JB/055/101/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 55.
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1825-04-02 |
1-4 |
||
|
055 |
Constitutional Code; Procedure Code |
||
|
101 |
Procedure Code |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
Text sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
E1 |
||
|
J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824 |
|||
|
Jonathan Blenman |
|||
|
1824 |
|||
|
17822 |
|||