★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
1827 Jany 29
Penal Code(4)
Ch. XII. Remedies
§. Commination and Subtutelation
Under English law; these remedial securities
are never employed but in conjunctions.
There is no reason why they should be always
conjoined and there is much reason why they
should be separated: to wit, commination, without
subtutelation.
An actual concomitant, though not
a necessary consequence of this conjunction, is
that the penal sum rendered exigible at
the charge of the delinquent, bears commonly
if not always a certain proportion to that exigible
at the charge of the thus constituted guardians.
1. The two remedies ought not to be always
conjoined: one reason is that the cases are
numerous, in which it may be altogether out of
a delinquent's power to find so much as a single
person, able and willing to take upon himself
such a charge: whereas there is no person to
whom it may not happen to take effectual
warning from a commination of which he
alone is the objection.
2. In English practice, eventual punishment
thus denounced, is never other than pecuniary.
But some there are, to whom it is altogether impossible
to find the matter of any such punishment.
In this condition, or that which is next to it, will in
every state of society and every country be a great
majority of the whole population; and the more
unable a man is to furnish the matter for punishment
in this shape, the more unsuitable
it is to his case, and the more necessary it is
to look out for and employ eventual punishment
in some other shape.
A
Identifier: | JB/068/293/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 68.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
1827-01-29 |
4-6 |
||
068 |
penal code |
||
293 |
penal code |
||
001 |
|||
copy/fair copy sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d2 / e2 |
||
john flowerdew colls |
j whatman turkey mill 1826 |
||
jonathan blenman |
|||
1826 |
|||
22488 |
|||