JB/078/101/001

Click Here To Edit

1826 Sept. 21
Review of Humphreys

1o
Ch. Agenda
§. Trusts pp. 303 to 309
(2

With submission, in and to a transaction of this sort in
the creation of a trust, there are three distinguishable parties
in every case effectually concerned: and it is only by accident in a particular case that
the two characters are united in one person. These are
1. the my intended benefitee 2. the trustor his and my
trustor and the always existing so long as what is called Equity has been
in existence trustee. Here In this drama there are essentially three different characters:
and how d is it that he provides for the representation
of them. To his trustor he gives a charge the representing
not only the creator of the trust but the party for whose benefit
it is created: the dead grandfather for instance, and the
living infant. This is really too much: scarcely would the
of Mathias be equal to it.

By accident Thus it is that in some cases not only two of the
three characters but all three in one trust are united in the same person
— for if spontaneously a person in debt were voluntarily/spontaneously to invest his
property in divers persons or trustees, himself for one, for the in trust
to pay his debt, and that done to restore it to his sole
possession.

A curious enough circumstance The curious circumstance is that the party for who
the bringing holding of whom of to view apart/one in a separate state no provision is made is
the very only party whose interest alone is the interest that should
professed and proper and as such professed object of the arrangement —
the intended benefitee By Mr H is not out Of the neglect shewn to the
by his This is not a interest of the unfortunate
party, the Equity Masters are stand accused by Mr
H. with unquestionable justice, but of this same neglect, if he
will take the trouble to look back for this purpose to what he has
given us furnished us with on this subject, he will not find himself altogether guiltless
On the part of Chancellor, it is in no small extent had from it been the result of
principle
principle. I mean
their only
principle — sinister
interest, in his as no less incontestably
as in my own case it might have been, of honest oversight
or inadvertence.

Identifier: | JB/078/101/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.
Date_1	1826-09-21	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	078	Main Headings	Review of Humphreys
Folio number	101	Info in main headings field	Review of Humphreys
Image	001	Titles
Category	Text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	E2
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	25192
Box Contents