xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/078/153/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1826. Novr. 17
Review of Humphreys

ult
Ch. Agenda

(2) § Introduction

by its appropriate denomination for this is what the language furnishes and
that is denomination alike familiar to every body, each should be must upon the face of the instrument
and that upon the first glance to by the most superficial
glance the effect produced by the instrument may as be so usual
be concurred be made present to the mind

As to the Code . . an effect assurance unquestionably desirable is that
what is done should be seen to be all that according to the straights view taken of the
subject the nature of the case requires to be done. By the
consideration had of the topics, or abreviations this assurance of all comprehensiveness
may be obtained. in the several ways of of comparable, exposition or say
and ratiocinations, give and instructing when needful to the subordinate functionaries the judicial say what the end in view requires to
be said in relation to each toper and you will have said all
that the nature of the case can require. When to the aggregate
of the matter
to for each deed you have provided a separate code
composed of the matter common to that applies in all descriptions allowed to be made of the species of
property in question (in this case bonded property) with the addition
of that which belongs exclusively to this same species of deed, and
have given to the aggregate that degree of brevity of which when
without prejudice to intelligibility it is susceptible you will find
the quantity of it so moderate that the in the papers in which the
matter of the deed instrument is about to be written the matter
of the whole of the portion of law bearing upon the subject may have been
presented Not that for effecting bringing the maximum of intelligibility to a maximum
it is not sufficient that this quality be given to each distinguishable sort
together: it must likewise be given to each distinguishable sort
taken separately. Unfortunately the maximum of brevity can
not be given to each part taken separately but at the expence
of that degree of brevity of which the whole if kept undivided would have
been susceptible: but for the sake of intelligibility there is a
the sacrifice will upon trial be found an advantageous one.

As to the lengthiness of the whole, notwithstanding vast as is the
reduction effected by the learned reformist, be enough remains to produce
consequences which such as (it will be seen) he can not have anticipated.
to have produced consequences
he was little aware
of.




Identifier: | JB/078/153/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.

Date_1

1826-11-17

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

078

Main Headings

Review of Humphreys

Folio number

153

Info in main headings field

Review of Humphreys

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C2

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

25244

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk