JB/078/154/001

Click Here To Edit

1826. Novr. 17
Review of Humphreys

ult
Ch. Agenda
(3) §§

(1)
Taking all three deeds formulæ together, it would have been a further
improvement if for giving expression to the matters common to all had been the same set of
words without variation had been employed: for in that case a
proportional reduction would have been made in the quantity of
the matter calling for consideration at the hands of the several classes
of persons interested: by the same quantity of attention on the part of the draughtsman a greater degree
of correctness might have been produced: and when no difference in meaning was
intended the reader would not have been led to suspect any such
difference as to but by the difference in the wording he is unavoidably
led to suspect.

(3)
By those consideration formulæ expressive samples for the expression of the same matter
a few exceptions excepted as that contained in those of our learned
reformist have been suggested. the two formulæ the author's and
the reviewers will be seen side by side in parallel columns: and
to the formulæ themselves were added a few Notes explanatory of
the consideration by which the respective variations were suggested.

2
As to what regards election, the our learned reformist is (page 3
presenting to view the properties shewable in a Code of property law
to jus marks with an object of well grounded reprobation the mode species of
Internal distinction. True it is that as no in Judge
made law technicality rhymes to . But in every branch of art and
science are to be found of necessity the peculiar terms: as
in the act of making law so in making shoes its and shoebrushes mending shoes
cleaning shoes not less than in making and mending laws
those terms which are expressive prisoners, adding where necessary needed
for fixation of import is further explanation appropriate definitive in its expression:
when they are inexpressive, frame and substitute others
that are the more expressions that can be devised: adding here in this case
as far as is needed where a definition is the effectual exclusion of obscurity by explanation, and if for more assured intellective use ambiguity
by

And not, that with the
exception of peculiar words such as have
already been defined, and
each definition should
be composed of have in it no other words
as in them such as are at
once familiar to every body, and
understood alike by every
body.

[+] [definition or [other] aspiration

Identifier: | JB/078/154/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.
Date_1	1826-11-17	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	078	Main Headings	Review of Humphreys
Folio number	154	Info in main headings field	Review of Humphreys
Image	001	Titles
Category	Text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	C3
Penner		Watermarks	J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1826
Marginals		Paper Producer	Jonathan Blenman
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1826
Notes public		ID Number	25245
Box Contents