xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/078/170/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1826. Augt 29
Review of Humphreys.

1o end
Humphreys Code

(8) or ( )? (4 Preliminary Enactments 7
J.B. Observation
Copyholds
Incidents

If the Copyholds sorts of the tenure in question are to be abolished, why must
separate mention of incidents to those in the guise of a separate
object capable of existing without them

In Arts. 1. all tenure except Copyholds are to be ipso facto utterly abolished.
As to the Copyholds in Art. 2 they are to be enfranchised.

But in addition to the abolition enfranchisement of the Copyhold
in operation mentioned as a distinct and additional one is — the extinction
of all feudal rent reliefs thereon (in Art. 1 as
was rents service, reliefs in respect thereof) Are not these what
in the case of other tenure he means by incidents of tenure? If so, the consequence
Had he said nothing about incidents contenting himself as for a
time , with abolishing the tenure the interests would of course have been
abolished along with it: the tenure gone, the incidents would have
had no ground to stand upon. Now suppose that in looking over
the list of incidents to Copyhold Services any one were to be found
which it were intended should be extinguished. Of the omission of
it in the list here gives the effect might probably be that it would
be held not to be abolished: whereas although it would have been along with
the rest if a mention had been made of the rest. There it is, this
Redundance in the Matter of Deficiency.

"Fee force rents" — are there no fee from rents that are
not attached to Copyholds

"Other perpetual rents" are there no other perpetual
rents than what are attached to Copyholds

As to rent if any as are attached to Copyholds either, as above
they were not had not been mentioned. Are

Are there any that are not attached to Copyholds? What
a jump is this from and without warning, for incidents belonging
to Copyholds to incidents not belonging to Copyholds!
And what tenure is it they belong to if not to Copyhold tenure?




Identifier: | JB/078/170/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.

Date_1

1826-08-29

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

078

Main Headings

Review of Humphreys

Folio number

170

Info in main headings field

Review of Humphreys

Image

001

Titles

Category

Text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

[[page_numbering::C8 or [ ] ? / E4]]

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1824

Marginals

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1824

Notes public

ID Number

25261

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk