xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/078/191/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1826. Novr 30.
Review of
J. B. v. Sugden
6

There any such conflict has place whereabouts
is certainty? Between the two conflicting
guides, the Judge is at full liberty to follow whichever
of them he pleases: whichever of them is most conformable
to his particular and sinister interest
in the business, if he has any, or to his caprice,
taste or fancy, if he has none. Suppose men all
direct regard for universal interest out of the question,
that interest being either neutral or not
consulted: remains, for sole guide, the aggregate
of devisions regarded as analogous. Suppose now
one decision as analogous to the individual
case in question, as a decision can easily be:
this one decision, if followed, will it insure certainty?
No such thing; for, anterior to this decision, has
been a decision on a case as near to it as possible,
and acting operating in a direction exactly opposite:
and, with decisions thus repugnant to each other,
the whole field of Judge-made law is strewed over;
not to say covered.

Now there as to this matter how stands the
case with Statute Law? In regard to Statute Law,
the rule is simple: between statute and statute
repugnance, be it even so direct, creates no difficulty;
the last statute determines the decision:
all preceding ones repugnant to it are as if they
had never been. Since it is that What it is impossible, is that whether
between two statutes of different dates repugnance
altogether irreconcilable has place, may
be matter of more or less doubt and difficulty.
But this case is a comparatively rare one: and would
be still more rare if that were done which
Mr Sugden is so anxiously contending against,
viz the reducing of all enactments into one consistent,
or at least endeavours to be made
consistent, Code —

All



Identifier: | JB/078/191/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 78.

Date_1

1826-11-30

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

078

Main Headings

Review of Humphreys

Folio number

191

Info in main headings field

Review of JB v. Sugden

Image

001

Titles

Category

Copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

C6

Penner

Watermarks

J WHATMAN TURKEY MILL 1826

Marginals

Paper Producer

Jonathan Blenman

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1826

Notes public

ID Number

25282

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk