JB/081/067/001

Click Here To Edit

1829. May 21.
Petitions
Supplement
§ Elucidation
§ Small Debt Courts

1.
II. Second object of comparison
to the here-proposed-summarily-proceeding
judiciary system
the Small Debt
Courts.

2.
These being to be
compared with the
here-proposed system
will at the same
time be to be compared
with the Justice
of Peace summarily
proceeding Courts.
For both these comparisons
the same
method will serve.

3.
Employed here for
elucidation of
the Small Debt
summarily proceeding
system is the
Scotch Small Debt
Court Bill.

4.
Reasons for thus
mentioning it before
English Small Debt
Courts.
In the Scottish
system, unity.
1. All-comprehensiveness.
2. Symmetry as to
Procedure and Official
Establishment.
In the English,
Local field in mutually
distant scape
scraps lie African
Oases: Multitude innumerable
unknown:
requiring to to be

---page break---

4. (contd.)
known by Motion
in Parliament.
☞ N.B. They may
be known from
the Cost list of Private
Acts.

5.
Parallel between
Scotch and the here-proposed
summary
system – Procedure
and Establishmt.
together under heads.
I. Device excluded
by J.B. and the Scots.

6.
2. Devices not
employed by the Scotch
cause, the occasion
not resent.
1. Juries subdued.
2. Jurisdiction split.

7.
3. Devices employed
by Scotch, but in
inferior degree.
1. Delay necessitated.
2. Blind fixation.
3. Mechanical Judicature.

8.
of delay & precipitation
decision
devices, chief source
Mechanical judicature
decision. device.

9.
Note – To Scotch
havers correspond
J.B.'s Evidence-holders.

10.
So to have and
hold in an English
conveyance.
For Evidence-hold.
– See Rationale
of Evidence and Const.
Code Ch. VI. Legislature.

---page break---

11.
Follow remarks
as to
1. Intercourse securing
principle.
See Prayer 28 to 24.
2. Mutual Responsibility-securing
principle.
See Prayer 35
to 38.

12.
1. Intercourse-securing
principle.
– Use none made
of it in
1. English existing
system.
2. Scotch Do.

13.
3. In French, yes:
viz.
But the provision
made is inadequate.

14.
Regret that before
printing Art. 28; of
the Prayer this
principle had not
by name presented
itself.

15.
Responsibility-securing,
its object,
minimizing incidental
evil, to
parties and non-parties.

16.
On condition of employing
the security thus
afforded, in all cases
where death is
not the punishmt.
the equivalent of
defensible execution
may provisionally
be produced
at the outset.

17.
Correspondent so
Bacon's polychrists
are J.B.'s all-comprehensive
arrangements.

18.
Responsibility-securing
principle
narrow exemplificaton

---page break---

18 (contd.)
of it.
1. Scoticé, insequestration
in hands of
havers.
2. Londonicé, in foreign
attachment.

19.
In English regular
procedure, Outlawry
a wretched succedaneum
to it.
See Jurist for 1828.
IV. Art VII. p.120.

20.
Outlawry an instrument
of Judge's
projected conquest.
Henry VI

Identifier: | JB/081/067/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.
Date_1	1829-05-21	Marginal Summary Numbering	1-20
Box	081	Main Headings	petition for justice
Folio number	067	Info in main headings field	petitions
Image	001	Titles
Category	marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering
Penner	john flowerdew colls	Watermarks	b&m 1828
Marginals		Paper Producer	arthur moore; richard doane
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year	1828
Notes public		ID Number	25854
Box Contents