JB/081/113/001

Click Here To Edit

1829 March 31
Petition

19
Supplement
(19 §.3 Suits in pendency

A line will require to be drawn between the cases where the most
satisfactory and trustworthy evidence that the nature of things affords: namely
view was elicited and is to be had in the first instance without
need of reading the testimony elicited in the epistolary mode
Generally speaking a suit capable of being determined on the ground of the
orally elicited may receive much greater dispatch than and even
be decided upon or made false assurance, than a suit in which
a necessity has place for the recourse to episto elicited evidence
But to this point the proper choice will depend in every instance
on the rules, and circumstances of the individual case, not of any class
of case, to which it may be considered as belonging. Which state
be entitled to the preference classed not merely on local
distance but on and frequency of appropriate applicable for this
to these purposes. Nor does it depend solely upon these circumstances
exclusively but upon the circumstance in conjunction with the simplicity
or complexity of the nature of the fact and the evide circumstantive
evidence of the circumstated hand case which it has happened to it
to afford.

Identifier: | JB/081/113/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.
Date_1	1829-03-31	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	081	Main Headings	petition for justice
Folio number	113	Info in main headings field	petition
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d19 / e19
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	street & co
Marginals		Paper Producer	antonio alcala galiano
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	25900
Box Contents