JB/081/201/001

Click Here To Edit

1829. April 10
Petitions

So much for the here proposed system in as the procedure Now as to what
relation to this topic. Now for regards the Establishment. Under the existing system, still considered
in respect of it's best, or as some may say least
bad mode – it's summary mode.

Here follows a brief delineation of the
leading features of it. A standard of reference and comparison
having been set up, as above, composed of the
appropriate abovementioned prayer, and the body of securities
just exhibited, this standard the reader will do well
to keep in mind, while looking over the list of these same the corresponding
leading features of that portion of the existing system which contrasts with it will
be seen forming so strong a contrast with it.⊞
⊞ 1. Number of seals, in the Judicatory applied to in the first instance. In Unites the existing system in one of the two Justice of Peace Courts acting in the summary mode.

In the Judicatory to which, on the occasion
of every sort of such suit, application, made by suitors must
be made in the first instance (Judicatory stiled in the
here proposed system Immediate, in contradistinction to appellate) the Justice Chamber single seated. So likewise in
the here proposed mode. Thus for the be in one cut of In the other sumarily acting Justice of the Peace Court, number of
the seats infinite: consequences
in respect of
corruption, and
every one with which
a judicatory can be
defiled, – those
which have been
already brought to
view
he then Justice of Peace Courts above mentioned of the existing system

2. Local fields of service, not one for all Under the summary mode
not as under the regular mode of that same system, one for all local field, and
that all comprehensive, extending over the whole of England,
(including to some purposes Water, to others not,) as under
the regular mode of the existing system, but numerous:
composed of the territories of the several Counties:
namely that is to say in England 40: in Wales 12: together, 52. But, the
demarcation, not formed on any well considered plan, or
deduced from any determinate principle: in the case of
some counties, the extent several times as great as in the
case of others: and the inconvenience, produced by the
case of others: and the inconvenience, produced by the
inequality in quantity, increased by the irregularity in form as to this point, see under the here proposed system the geography of the proposed judicial territories, as delineated in the Prayer Art. 4 page 177.

3. Number in a Judicatory. One only. Of this
feature the nature has been amply considered, and it's beneficial
tendency, (is is hoped,) incontestably proved by the author
of these pages: to wit, in the proposed Constitutional Code
Vol. I. Ch. VI. Legislature § Number in an office, and Ch. XII.
Judiciary Collectively, §.5. Number in a Judicatory.
4.

Identifier: | JB/081/201/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.
Date_1	1829-04-10	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	081	Main Headings	petition for justice
Folio number	201	Info in main headings field	petitions
Image	001	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c2 / d35
Penner	john flowerdew colls	Watermarks	street & co
Marginals		Paper Producer	antonio alcala galiano
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	25988
Box Contents