★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
ultisso
Supplement
II. Elucidation
§.6. Reconciliation
§ 1 Reconciliation Commission
explained
1.2.3.4?
§.2. Why here mentioned
say life
4.5.
§.3. Beneficial effects in
Denmark Source of
information. 7*
7?
§.4. Party's appearance
function sole
cause of the benefit — viz dimintn
of the number of
suits
8.9? 10? 11?
§4*
§.6. Danish Reconciliation
Commission
I.1 1.
For elucidation of advantages
of proposed system,
Danish Reconciliation
Courts are entire an eminently
appropriate institution
as the most extensively
known and
incontestably useful.
I.2 2.
Reconciliation Commissions
what.
I.3 3.
Suits included 1 Cases
of debt 2 do of wrong to
reputation 3 do of wrong
to Person.
II.1 4.
Reasons for mention
of the Danish Institution.
II.2 5.
Uses of this mention
of the institution.
1. Important services
already rendered by it.
2. That in this institution
personal appearance
of parties at the
outset, the principal
feature of proposed
system has been for
25 years in practice.
3. By this personal
appearance the beneficial
effects of the
institution produced.
4. Beneficial effects
of proposed system
greater than would
be produced than by
engrafting this Danish
institution on the existing system.
§.6. Danish Reconciliation Commission
5. (contd.)
5. By Denmark gratuitous
justice granted
to the indigents.
6. By Denmark the
cause of all law
abuse indicated.
III.1 7.
Beneficial effects of
the institution in
Denmark. [|]
[|] Diminution of the number of suits
without denial
of justice
7* Sources of
information
1 Rothe's Memoire
2 Private informatn from Schleyel.
IV. 1 8.
Proposition that party's
attendance the sole
cause of the good effects
of the institution.
Proofs from the tables
in Rothe's Memoire.
Nothing but this and inspection to
distinguish this from the
ordinary Tribunal.
IV.2 9.
Inducements to parties
to give up their
intended recourse to
the ordinary Court.
1. To Defendant probability
that Plaintiff's
demand will be acceded to.
IV.3 10
2. To Plaintiff inducements
two 1. Opinion
that the Ordinary Court
will not grant the demand
2 Opinion that by
acceptation from Defendant
of a reduced
sum the reduction
would be more than
balanced by the risks
of deposition of evidence
or misdecision
in case of prosecution
before the ordinary
Court.
IV.4 10.
Of these inducements
the only one due to the
institution in question
is the diminution of
delay, vexation, & & expense.
V.1 11.
For elicitation of
evidence this Court
affords no facility.
VI.1 12
Features by which
the good effects are produced
two
1 Bringing the adverse
parties together
in the presence of
arbiters.
2 Delivering an opinion
as to probable
result of the proposed
suit.
VIII.1 13.
Importance ascribed
to party's attendance
by Danish
legislator. Nothing but
the need impartially to distinguish
this original from the
ordinary one
VII. 1 14.
Importance really
belonging to it.
V.2. 15.
Efficacy of imperative
decree thus pronounced
none but
by consent of parties.
IX.1 16.
Relation of proposed
system to the Danish
institution
1 By proposed system
personal attendance
employed with additional
advantages.
IX.2 17.
2 Under proposed
system time and
labour of obtaining
an opinion other
than that of the
Judge-saved.
X.1. 18.
Danish institution
inapplicable to England.
X.2. 19.
Suppose in England
a motion made for
adoption of such an
institution. If carried
probable course
1. Appointment of a Committee.
2 Selection of Commissioners
determined
to follow the course
pointed out by the
Cabinet. 3. Sure objects
of their desire 1 encrease of judicial costs. 2 Increase
of judicial costs. 2
increase of no in of Number of jobs.
|
Identifier: | JB/081/231/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
1829-06-01 |
1-19 |
||
|
081 |
petition for justice |
||
|
231 |
petitions |
||
|
001 |
|||
|
marginal summary sheet |
1 |
||
|
recto |
|||
|
john flowerdew colls |
|||
|
26018 |
|||