xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/241/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1829 May 25
Petitions

ulto
Supplement

(4 §.11 Elucidations
§ Reconciliation Commissioners

7
1. Minimization of expence
& delay
In 1826 Causes saved
from Judge & Cos jaws
22,105

1 Benefit the first. Substitution of an inexpensive and
undilatory to an expensive and dilatory remedy. In all Denmark,
In the year 1826, the latest, of which in 1829 the accounts
had been published. In all Denmark, number of the
causes commenced on or say de number of applications
made to the Commissioners 24,071: whereof, after the Opinion pronounced
by the Commissions, commenced no more than 1,966.
Saved thus from the jaws of the fee-fed Judges and professional lawyers,
22,105.

8
True that of these
2595 dropt
Cause of these being
dropt
1 Inability to afford
the expence of a suit
2 Opinion that the
chance of success not
worth the expence
3 Perception of
defendants insolvency

True it is, that of the 24,072 no more than 16,038
were settled to the mutual advantage of both parties: and that after
having been dismissed, no fewer than 7,555 were by the originally
intended proposed demandant or say plaintiffs dropt without
being though
and not carried before the ordinary Courts
dropt and Of those being thus dropt and yet without having
received compensation what may have been the cause or
causes. Answer Of those that the following it should seem one. 1. Inability
to afford the expence of a suit before those orders in those seats
of depredation. 2. Opinion derived from that From the opinion
delivered by the Commission a persuasion that the value of the
chance of obtaining the subject matter of the demand was not an equitable
to the part for the expence. 3. Perception or persuasion of the inability
of the proposed defendant to pay the amount of the demand,
especially after the drainage experienced suffered by him in the fee-fed
judicatory.

9
Thus out of a population
of 2,000,000 salvation
afforded to 150,000.

So many Here then in that small dominion population
inhabitants not so many as 2,000,000 upwards of
22,000 pair of litigants rescued in the course of that one Year
from the carnivorous jaws: individuals so many, c considered
in an isolated state: but considered as a family
state. if the number were no great than taking the number at no more than 5 in a family; this
will make 110,000. But instead of one litigant and no more
on each side, litigants, in suits in any number litigants there
may have been in any number, on one side or on both sides: from this source if no
more than 8000 individual litigants, making 40,000 litigant families,
how will b 150,000, be the number of those to whom within
that short compass of time, salvation in that shape was extended.



Identifier: | JB/081/241/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-05-25

Marginal Summary Numbering

7-9

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

241

Info in main headings field

petition

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

e4

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

b&m 1829

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

arthur moore; richard doane

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1829

Notes public

ID Number

26028

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk