JB/081/249/001

Click Here To Edit

1829 May 28
Petitions

ulto
Supplement
11 § II Elucidations
§ Reconciliation

(3)
Proofs Manifestations of this species regular qualification attended
to the situation of Commissioner-Judge. 1. Not being an Advocate: 2. Not
being an Attorney Not being a member of Judge in an Ordinary Judicature
that is to say in a Judicatory in which to judicial official service payment
remuneration is in the shape of fees. Reason assigned opposite of interest to duty.

(1)
Instructive, in no small degree, are the lessons afforded by
that institution

1. Lesson the first. Usefulness of the arrangement by which
the suitors without the intervention of any advisers, especially
any mercenary advisers are ad at the very outset of
and for the purpose of giving commencement to the enquiry
admitted into the presence of these provisional and eventual
substitutes to the Judge.and representatives of the Judge Measure of the usefulness, proportion
between the number of the victims unavoidably abandoned to
the Demon of discourse and that of the happy mortals
rescued from his clutches.

2. Lesson the second. Opinion evidence in support
of the No-fee principle — the to assertion of the incompatibility of payment responsible hypocrits who while
by fees for official service with wallowing in bond of the pursuit of the ends of justice
and the principles which, after lapses of time matchless sufficient for appropriate
appeal apprenticeship in the service of justice purely, forbids the
appointment of any person who has practiced in the capacity of
an Advocate from being placed in the situation of Judge.

(2)
2. Lesson the second. Opinion evidence delivered — and
by authority so eminently competent — evidence of the
corruptive influence of payment in the shape of fees (for judicial by fees on judicial service
service the service of official punishment bearing any part filling any situation in the
administration of justice

For service employed in the administration of justice
thence of the primeval cause of all the woes endured
by suitors:

well merited shame thrown in the blindness
evidence of the almighti predominance of self regard in the as in every
human other so in every judicial bosom: of the weakness of those who can really really
constrain any hope of usefulness from any system of legal
arran arrangement grounded on any other build expectation than on any
other ground than that of its general predominance: of the hypocrisy and untrustworthiness
of all those who, not being thus blind, pretend to be so.

Identifier: | JB/081/249/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.
Date_1	1829-05-28	Marginal Summary Numbering	16
Box	081	Main Headings	petition for justice
Folio number	249	Info in main headings field	petitions
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	[[page_numbering::[...?]]]
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	26036
Box Contents