JB/081/250/001

Click Here To Edit

1829 May 23
Petitions

ulto
Supplement
(18 §. II Elucidations
§. Reconciliation Court

N.B. To save expence and delay
plaintiff will accept less than his dues

☞ Add somewhere
How consistent with
demand of justice — what is
it good for?

9
Correspondent advice
given by the Tribunal
1. To Defendant
render in full the
service demanded
2. To Plaintiff,
desist from all
demand
3. To Defendant.
render in part
the service demanded:
to Plaintiff accept
that part.

The Tribunal has formed (supposed) its opinion: Now
then consider its advice is given accordingly. For producing compliance with
this advice consider now the meeting of what it will be have the
faculty of making application

1. Advice to the Defendant. Render to the Plaintiff the service
he demands at your hands, or some other which he is willing in his eyes
to accept or in w is equivalent to it. opinion
that in the event of a suit such will be the opinion of the ordinary
Judicatory.

2. Advice to the Plaintiff. Desist altogether from demanding
at the hands of the D proposed Defendant the services
you have it in contemplation to demand: opinion, as in
the case last mentioned that in case the want of a the demand made
at the hands of the ordinary judicatory, it will not be in any part
ordered to be rendered.

3. Advice to the Defendant. Instead of the service demanded
at your hands or the full equivalent, if, the hands
withdrawing the demand in question the Plaintiff substitutes to it
the demand of another service to a certain amount
less burthensome to you (say for example the service currently
in the payment of Half the sum of money at first as yet demanded,
render it: opinion that in case of the a demand render
of a service to that amount that at least it will be ordered to be rendered.

So much for England Denmark. Now for England. instruction. Now as to adoption
This same Reconciliation Commission system would it in any
case be proposable for England? Answer. No: not in any
case. Why? Answer. Because, by no man in authority while to the degree that has
would it be supported been seen it falls short of being adequate to the supposed desired purposes it would not be more likely to be
carried into effect than would the hereby proposed Dispatch
Court: nor receive support for any other purpose or any better effect than
that of drawing off supporters from that exclusively adequate
remedy.

Identifier: | JB/081/250/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.
Date_1	1829-05-23	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	081	Main Headings	petition for justice
Folio number	250	Info in main headings field	petitions
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	[[page_numbering::e18[?]]]
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	b&m 1829
Marginals		Paper Producer	arthur moore; richard doane
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1829
Notes public		ID Number	26037
Box Contents