★ Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts
E 6
(6
Supplement
Postscript
§.2. Elucidation
1. Sinister Procedures.
☞ 18 May 1829 Quere whether to employ any part of this sheet?
Supposed superseded in toto
III. H. of Commons
Evidence Elicitation Courts
House of Commons
Evidence wanted for
legislative arrangements
elicitated with the
least delay & expence.
III. House of Commons Legislative authority. Whatsoever
legislative arrangement a King Minister of the King or
other Minister Member of the House of Commons has or conceives himself
to have an interest in causing to be made law
he finds it necessary to make in some shape or other a ground
for it, and for the formation of that ground appropriate evidence
is commonly necessary: among the objects of his endeavours,
is accordingly in relation the elicitating of all evidence regarded
as contributing to that end the eliciting it in the most instructive
and probative shape possible, and with the least delay and expence
possible.
House of Commons
Means taken To accomplish
the ends in view whatever
they be, the means taken
in respect of elicitation
of evidence — the most
apt.
iv. House of Commons again. Judicial authority as.
above. Looking at the matter While viewing the whole field in a general point of view
each Member sees that it is his interest that justice should
be done, that person in general deriving from whatsoever
source the expectation of fitting in any number the suit situations
in question with themselves and or their respective nominees shall
find on each occasion those expectations fulfilment not disappointment
but fulfilment, the results of those same expectations.
For As to the end in view — namely his giving fulfilment
to those several expectation in those several instances, the
aptitude of it with relation to universal interest and greatest happiness
is another and very very different question: but as a
means tending to that same end, the aptitude of this mode
of procedure in respect of the elicitation of evidence, in contradistinction
to that pursued in the Superior Courts Judicatory
called Superior Courts, is unquestionable.
Identifier: | JB/081/358/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.
|
|||
---|---|---|---|
1829-03-23 |
not numbered |
||
081 |
petition for justice |
||
358 |
petitions |
||
001 |
|||
text sheet |
1 |
||
recto |
d6 / e6 |
||
jeremy bentham |
1828 |
||
1828 |
|||
26145 |
|||