xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/081/397/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1829. April.
Petition.
Supplements
§ 2. Elucidation.
History & Aetiology.
33
Parliaments conviction
of the inaptitude of the
regular system proved
by employment given
to the summary

Instructive, and with a view to practice
in the highest degree important, is the certificate
we have on this subject — a certificate given by
Parliament: a certificate, declarative of the utter
inaptitude of the regular course, in all the several so
numerous and diversified ramifications of which the
tyger-stuffed jungle is composed. By Parliament? Yes:
by every Parliament, from the very first, by which an
exemplification of this summary and solely apt course
was given, down to the present. A certificate?
says somebody. Where is it? Answer. Every where.
In what words? Answer. Not in words but in and
by deeds: proofs, so much more conclusive than
it is in the power of words to be.

☞ For

p. 10

34
Objection If it Assertion that where
summary mode not
established by Parliament
it is not the most apt
mode — a fallacy
Addendum.

From p. 9. Suppose now that after admitting that
the summary mode is most apt in the cases in which
by Parliament as above it is established an assertion
mode by any body is — that where by Parliament
the summary mode is not established it is not the
most apt mode. On whom, on this supposition
does the onus probandi lie? On the opponent of
the summary mode assuredly. On him it lies — to
show in what ways and by what means in each
several case the chance for right decision
would be diminished, the chance for misdecision
increased, by the substitution of the summary to the
regular mode. Any such means do they exist?
If yes it is in his power to bring them to view. Does
he decline this? by doing so he gives proof that none
such is he able to find; he contradicts his own
assertion if he has said there are.



Identifier: | JB/081/397/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 81.

Date_1

1829-04

Marginal Summary Numbering

33-34

Box

081

Main Headings

petition for justice

Folio number

397

Info in main headings field

petition

Image

001

Titles

Category

copy/fair copy sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

john flowerdew colls

Watermarks

1828

Marginals

george bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1828

Notes public

ID Number

26184

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk