JB/106/130/001

Click Here To Edit

7 March 1807

Misdecision pro tanto admitts of considerable diversification.
What then is can be of error in it seems reducible to two heads:
the one respecting quantity; the other, conditionality.
In Midsdecision pro tanto in so far as it regards quantity the error may
either be in the way of excess side of defect, or in the way of defect side of excess.
Thus the damages given by a Jury may be have sometimes been deemed either insufficient,
or excessive much oftener more frequently excessive.

Misdecision respecting conditionality may consist either
in giving adjudging that absolutely which ought not to have been
given adjudged but upon conditions; or in adjudging th upon conditions
that which ought to have been adjudged absolutely; or
is when it was right that the adjudication and should
be affected by conditions, attaching some co to it some
wrong condition or conditions or f omitting to attach to it
some condition or conditions which ought to have been
attached to it.

To the modes of misdecision in respect of conditionality
correspond so many modes of correction, in the way of modification,
as above. The enumeration of them may, it
is supposed be assured.

Identifier: | JB/106/130/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 106.
Date_1	1807-03-07	Marginal Summary Numbering	18-19
Box	106	Main Headings	scotch reform
Folio number	130	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e9
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	34718
Box Contents