xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/116/311/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

21 15 7 July 1802 + 15 21 N. S. Wales

Conduct III Non existence proved 15 (1) 16 21 Such power is repugnant to the panoply of the Complete law.
Abolished lastly), Relinquished in fact but tacitly if at all (for the point is
not worth arguing)
, if the power had been declared illegal, and abolished by
express words, it would not have been so disposed of without very sufficient
grounds. That over English subjects, in England or
any where else, the King should, [+] [+] by himself or by others. exercise y legislative power, without
the concurrence of Parliament, was repugnant to the
constitution — was irreconciliable repugnant to [at any rate to the spirit —
perhaps was to the letter of
Magna Charta. B

16 19 22 The practice begun under James 1st
Till the reign of George the Second — till the year 1740
at least, as above, I know not of its being having been doubted disputed or doubted of: and
the of precedents, by which it has been exercised, commences
with what appears as the take first charter, extant given to for the first Colony in my
with in the reign of James in 1606 or thereabouts the 1st + + See Lind's remarks in the Acts of the 13th Parliament relative to the Colonies — 1775. or if in the reign of Elizabeth.

23 17 The we of Parliament to legislative power was not then settled nor since.
But, in since the day, in which the practice that originated,
the exitensive right of Parliament to legislative power,
was by no means far from being defined as now. Even within the territory
of England, in this and that and t'other pretext ground, the King
by his proclamations, would be legislating without Parliament,
and even in spite of Parliament. Whatever Parliament would
endure to see him do, suffer him to do without complaint this and more he was sure to do without
Parliament. Monopolise Ship money — dispensations of formal statutes, & even
levying money without account of Parliament. Even the The very existence
of Parliament was a matter of perpetual contingency.
At all times it depended upon the Kings pleasure whether there
should ever be another. And so long as he could
contrive to go on with existing powers, and upon existing
funds, he had every thing to lose and nothing to gain by
calling to his aid any such troublesome co-adjutors.

Admitting that in any one spot of ground, the property of belonging to &
having English owners,
Englishmen and not subject to under the dominion of a foreign power,
the concurrence of the two other estates is necessary to legislation,
no reason can be given why on any principle of it should be less necessary
on any other spot so circumstanced. Certain non
distant your more current.

Even




Identifier: | JB/116/311/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 116.

Date_1

1802-07-02

Marginal Summary Numbering

15-17

Box

116

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

311

Info in main headings field

n. s. wales

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

a21 / b15 / d15 / f21

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

37844

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk