xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/117/110/004

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

16 Case relative to the Tothill Fields Bill.

matter of regret, but are never regarded as affording matter of
peremptory objection. Compensation is applied, as far as it can be
applied: and where it cannot, the damage (which in the present
instance, cannot surely amount to much if any thing)
is regretted without being compensated.

It will hardly (it should seem) be contended that the
creation of a perpetuity, and that too in favor of waste and
desolation, would in this instance, any more than in any
other, be a fit object for Parliament to propose to itself: Yet such
would be the Judgment virtually involved, in any determination
which should regard the objection grounded on the supposed
extraordinary value of the Common Right to the very small
proportion of the Commoners, as opposing a peremptory Bar to
the improvement of the Waste, on the Plan here proposed. If, even
with the support of the Plea of Public exigency, the private Plea,
grounded on the Interests of the vast majority of the Commoners,
is not strong enough to outweigh the objection, much less will it
be when standing alone, as it would do in the instance of
any Plan of Improvement originating with, and confined in
its object to the sole benefit of the Commoners. If the two Pleas
together are not strong enough, much less can the weaker ever
be when standing alone.

As to pecuniary compensation for the Rights in question,
either they are susceptible of it, or they are not: if they are, they
are as susceptible of it on the present occasion, as they can be
on any other; if they are unsusceptible of it, and the Circumstance of their being so is to be considered as a conclusive Bar
to their being given up, then, so long as it is considered in
that Sight, the Waste must remain a Waste, were it to the
end of time.

Were this Waste to be divided, like other Wastes, among
all the Commoners, in Proportion to their respective quantities
of Interest (in the present instance in equal Shares) the quantity of



Identifier: | JB/117/110/004
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

117

Main Headings

panopticon

Folio number

110

Info in main headings field

case relative to the tothill fields bill

Image

004

Titles

Category

collectanea

Number of Pages

4

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

f13 / f14 / f15 / f16

Penner

Watermarks

g & ep 1794

Marginals

Paper Producer

fr3

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

1794

Notes public

ID Number

38727

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk