xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/117/262/004

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

4

To facilitate the comparison, I will beg leave to submit
to your Lordship a Table, in which the points of resemblance
and contrast between the three systems, under some of the
principal heads, are set down, side by side.

I. Penitentiary
System

1. Drunkenness, none.

2. Association with one
another, select: with
strangers, none.

3. To health, supremely
favourable: by sobriety,
cleanliness,
and constancy of occupation;
by mixture
of light with
heavy, indoor with
outdoor, work.

4. To comfort, for the
same reasons as to
health, eminently favourable;
as also by
security against uneasiness
from quarrels end oppresions:
saving always the
salutary discomfort
resulting from the
necessary discipline.

5. To reformation eminently
favourable,
in respect of the
inviolable

II. Hulk System

1. Drunkenness, none.

2. Association — with
one another, promiscuous:
with strangers.

3. To health, favourable
by sobriety: unfavourable
by want
of mixture of light
with heavy work,
and total occupation
for such as
are incapable of hard
and outdoor work.

4. To comfort, eminently
unfavourable;
by reason of the promiscuous
aggregation
in a crowded
space: under exposure
to unneasiness
from quarrels and
oppressions.

5. To reformation, eminently
unfavourable,
by reason of the

III. N.S. Wales
System

1. Drunkenness, universal.

2. Association — altogether
promiscuous:
Convicts, one with
another by thousands:
with soldiers
and seamen, with
each by hundreds.

3. To health, unfavourable
by drunkenness.
To vitality,
favourable nothwithstanding,
by the salubrity
of the climate:
setting aside
experienced frequency,
and perpetual
probrbility of famine
on the spot, and pestilence
during the
passage.

4. To comfort supremely
unfavourable; —
by the universal insecurity
in respect of
property; as well as
in respect of uneasiness
from quarrels
and oppressions.

5. To reformation supremely
unfavourable,
by reason of the
promiscuous



Identifier: | JB/117/262/004
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.

Date_1

Marginal Summary Numbering

Box

117

Main Headings

panopticon versus new south wales

Folio number

262

Info in main headings field

[[info_in_main_headings_field::third letter to lord pelh[a]m]]

Image

004

Titles

xv hulk systems compared with penitentiary and new south wales systems / i penitentiary system / ii hulk system / iii n. s. wales system

Category

printed material

Number of Pages

6

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

Penner

Watermarks

Marginals

Paper Producer

Corrections

jeremy bentham

Paper Produced in Year

Notes public

ID Number

38879

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk