JB/117/405/001

Click Here To Edit

3

26.
1. Stain on character
considered, either
of those places would
as likely be the objects
of aversion as of desire.
p.

27.
Principle on which
the subsidiary establishment
is grounded,
is—presumption of
such aversion: it
makes such removal
not necessary, nor actual
but in case
of desire.— p.

28.
2. At the maximum
of distance, Convicts
share of earnings
during the term would
afford ample means
of conveyance. p

29 3. If at public charge
such conveyance were
necessary, cheaper to
give to each money
sufficient to carry him
(on foot) to the furthest
spot: being that which,
for this purpose, each
would fname of course
p.

30
Objection. For the Counties
in England take
the expence out of the
universal fund, so you
must for Scotland and
for Ireland.

31.
Answer. Yes: but
1. So you have for colonization
and the
Hulks. p.

---page break---

32.
2. Panopticon plan
the best no reason for
refusing it to Scotland
or Ireland, but on the
supposition that they
are not part of the
United Kingdom, or
have not the same
right to good government. p.

33.
Conceding, Scotland
would be to have its
Panopticon. Ireland
its or or Panopticons.
Reasons against
London in these
cases.

1 Difference of Religious
rites
2. Remoteness of
discharged convicts
from domestic connections.

Identifier: | JB/117/405/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 117.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	26-33
Box	117	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	405	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	marginal summary sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f3
Penner	john herbert koe	Watermarks	th 1806
Marginals		Paper Producer	andre morellet
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year	1806
Notes public		ID Number	39022
Box Contents