JB/118/022/001

Click Here To Edit

Your Memorialist would not be much surprized,
if, in consequence of one of those misconceptions
into which where the affections are engaged we
are so apt to fall, he were to hear, that by
virtue of some conversation that may have passed,
between gentlemen that may have expressed expressing themselves
dissatisfied with the choice situation on one part subsisting choice
on one part and gentlemen in Administration and in Parliament
on the other, it should have been supposed conceived, that
the faith of Administration stood pledged to
put a negative upon that make the their choice. The Nor does would
the such a supposition altogether want colour from an
incident in the history of the Act, an incident
of which there was some it bears marks upon the face
of it. The Act originating solely out of the
treaty with your Memorialist the purview of it
the Bill as it was first drawn was accordingly
confined on this head as your Memorialist admitts, to the individual spot in
question. What he has been informed of and
also admitts is that the optional clause, now
standing as part of the Act and above referred
to, was inserted not in the before the bringing

Identifier: | JB/118/022/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering	31
Box	118	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	022	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	correspondence	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f47 / f48
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public	draft of letter 988, vol. 5	ID Number	39076
Box Contents