JB/118/074/001

Click Here To Edit

the opinion (whatsoever difference might arise on
the application of it to a particular spot) it was
the opinion of all the Judges: it was the opinion
of all the Supervisors (and it may be in your
recollection, Sir, that there were different sets
of them) that were successfully appointed for the
originally intended Penitentiary House. It was
the opinion of every Committee of the House of
Commons that ever sat upon the measure. It
was the opinion of Mr Howard, of Mr Whately,
and of Dr Fothergill, who delivered it into the
bosom of Mr Howard, sealed with the dying
breath of Sir William Blackstone. It was the
opinion of Sir Charles Bunbury, Sir Gilbert
Elliot and Dr Bowdler, by whom the present spot
was pitched upon for this cause: it was the opinion
of the Committee of 1784 of which Sir Charles
Bunbury was Chairman: and in whose Report
among the advantages which recommended the spot
in question to their repeated and maturest choice
it occupies a distinguished place. It is, or at any
rate very lately was, so much the opinion of Sir Charles
Bunbury, that after praising the paper before submitted
to you, Sir, in defence of this very choice, he was pleased
to pronounce it, I remember his very word, unanswerable.
Indeed

Identifier: | JB/118/074/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	118	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	074	Info in main headings field
Image	001	Titles
Category	correspondence	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	d17 f13 / d18 f14
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public	letter 988, vol. 5	ID Number	39128
Box Contents