JB/118/090/004

Click Here To Edit

Memorialist humbly apprehends, no sort of difference.
So far as any such investment took place
previously to the aforesaid decision of the 12 Judges,
the complainant stands precluded by a decision pronounced
against himself. So far as such investment
took place subsequently to such decision, he and all
similar complainants, at least in respect of the
neighbourhood and spot in question, stand equally
precluded, and that not only by the principle of the decision,
but, even here, by that very individual decision
itself. They were told by that decision, and told beforehand,
that, whatever might be thought by the neighbourhood,
an establishment for that purpose was
not deemed by the 12 Judges a nuisance; or at
least such a nuisance, against which a neighbourhood,
and in particular that neighbourhood, had
any title to be relieved.

In vain would it be urged, that the number of
persons exposed to its influence was not so great then
as it is become now: and that therefore, although
the nuisance was not, in respect of the number
of persons & quantity of property affected by it, arrived
at that time to at such a height as to create a
title to relief against itself, it does not follow but
that it may have arrived at such a pitch by
this time. — In vain: since in the first place
it

Identifier: | JB/118/090/004 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	118	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	090	Info in main headings field
Image	004	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f19 / f20 / f21 / f22
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections	jeremy bentham	Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	39144
Box Contents