JB/118/255/001

Click Here To Edit

17 June 1812
Panopt.

Had the law of good faith been the law to meant to be
conformed to, observe the course that would have been taken
in execution of it.

Suppose this or that feature looked upon as a feature
of imperfection, observed in any part of the management
as settled on and by the terms of the contract what ought to
have been the course.

Here is such a thing which you are not bound to do
we think in our opinion it would be for the advantage of your own you ought to be bound to
do it or suffer. Will you consent to be bound to do it? and if
so gratuitously or in consideration of what additional allowance
in the way of indemnification?

Even suppose consent consent on any terms peremptorily
refused – important indeed would the supposed imperfection
have been to warrant the rescinding rescission of the existing contract, taking such refusal for the ground of
it.

Identifier: | JB/118/255/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 118.
Date_1	1812-06-17	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	118	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	255	Info in main headings field	panopt.
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e10
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	<…> co
Marginals		Paper Producer	a. levy
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	39309
Box Contents