JB/123/227/001

Click Here To Edit

19
Case relative to the Tothill Fields Bill. —

6 ... But it is of the number of those cases where Consent
ought not to be looked upon as requisite. —

7 ... That such Consent, not being to be required by the
Legislature need not be nor ought to be applied for in form
and on the character of a condition sini que non on the Part
of Administration, by whom if at all the Bill will be brought
forward. —

8 ... That the attempt to act in concurrence with two such
unwieldly bodies as a Vestry composed of 50 Members, and the
Dean and Chapter who do not met above two or three times
in the Year, would present such a prospect of delay as no
Individual concerned in the execution of the measure could
expose himself to, especially in Addition to a chain of altogether
unexpected delays that have already consumed a Period of
between four and five Years. —

9 ... That, in a case so perfectly in point as to have embraced
the same Parochial District and the same Parties, an Act
creating Powers of the same sort but much stronger and attended
with prodigiously greater Hardship, and having much less
strong (if any) Public Ground for its support, was passed, not
only without application for consent but, against a strong and
general opposition, on the part of the Parties principally
interested. —

10 ... That the proposed improvement of the Waste cannot
be rejected, but for reasons, which if admitted, would set up a
perpetual Bar to its ever being improved at all. —

Identifier: | JB/123/227/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 123.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	123	Main Headings	panopticon
Folio number	227	Info in main headings field	case relative to the tothill fields bill
Image	001	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	2
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	f19 / f20
Penner		Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer	fr3
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1794
Notes public	see note 3 to letter 1392, vol. 6	ID Number	41653
Box Contents