JB/137/040/002

Click Here To Edit ult
1. Nature of the case
or
The following
experience should
have been made by
Or in the first instances
by the Prince Regents
advisors by whom
the rad were
charged with their
design

1819 Decr 18

- Radicalism not dangerous

—

I shall now p proceed to do what the Prince Regent's
advisers should first have done, namely bring to view the consequences
that would result from any the supposed subversion
of the rights of property: namely not from the accomplishment
of it - for that would be physically impossible - but
from the notoriety of a determinitive to carry such effect
make any advances towards the carrying of such a design
such effect by any set of person having power adequate to
the purpose.

or 2
It had under which
ing is
arranged
1. Intended Sh who
view
2. Shares equal
3. Subject matter remedy
proposition
4. Subject matter
inimitable
5. Subject matters

6. Subject matters fictitious
7. Intended shares
unascertainable
8.Shares consequent
9. Impossibility of all
other spoliation design
10. Anticipation
be of the concurrence
of any


11. The de impractical
impossible

The hands under which the matter necessary for the purpose
will be ranged are the following

1. Intended Shares who - stated the statement being in the first
instance given as it must be in provisionally, and general . Say for shortness Intended Shares
or a first view.

2 I. Effects of the Scheme Nature Explanation development of the plan inspected design on the supposition that the shares
are to be all equal. Say for shortness Shares equal

3. 1. Subject matter, mode of operation and immediate
operators - These topics will being inseparable in existence require to be brought to view
together.

4. Subject matter The scheme applied to Immoveable
articles subject matter of rights of property say for shortness in
and Immoveable Subject matter Immoveable

5. The scheme applied the Moveable subject-matters
Say for shortness in Subject matter Moveables

6. The scheme applied a fictitious subject-matters
of rights of property. Say Subject matter fictitious

7. Intended Shares Impossibility of any previous agreement on this point. Say Intended
Sharers, <add><hi rend="underline">or a second view</add> unascrible<</hi>

8. II. Development Nature of the imputed design, as the
supposition that the shares will be in any proportion
unequal. Say for shortness. Shares unequal

9. III Development Nature of the imputed design on the supposition
of any other unagreeable plan of spoliation.
say many Impossibility of all Any other conceivable design of spoliation.
Design of spoliation on other shapes impossible.

910. Operators in chief, or Constituted authorities the
known concurrence in the execution of such
a design would be necessary to the determination endeavour to carry into effect
Say. Impossibility Manifest Impossibility of the concurrence of any constituted authorities impossible The lauded disproves the imputed design

11. the impossibility of accomplishment success really the impossibilty of the imputed design. Say. The design impossible. 12. The proposed destroyed of
the design imputed.

Identifier: | JB/137/040/002 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.
Date_1	1819-12-01	Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	137	Main Headings	radicalism not dangerous
Folio number	040	Info in main headings field	radicalism not dangerous
Image	002	Titles
Category	collectanea	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	e6
Penner	jeremy bentham; john flowerdew colls	Watermarks
Marginals		Paper Producer
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year
Notes public		ID Number	46757
Box Contents