xml:lang="en" lang="en" dir="ltr">

Transcribe Bentham: A Collaborative Initiative

From Transcribe Bentham: Transcription Desk

Keep up to date with the latest news - subscribe to the Transcribe Bentham newsletter; Find a new page to transcribe in our list of Untranscribed Manuscripts

JB/137/347/001

Jump to: navigation, search
Completed

Click Here To Edit

1820 Jan. 12
Radical Reform Bill

15 § 9
III Experience
II Ireland

(2) (1) 1 J.B.'s
J.B. Conclusion

or 8 or 1
Misconception now
not possible

J.B.'s Democratic ascendency
here explained
1. in Introd..to Reform
Catechism 2. here
In forms of government
no change; in the representation
none in principle
compared with
primeval state. Prorogations,
could Privileges the
same.
.

There will not now I hope be much room for
misconception.

What I mean by democratic ascendency has was
been explained here and Ao 1817 in the Introduction
to my Parliamentary Reform Catechism, and again
in the present pages: the ascendency of the people as
it would be effected by radical reform, as here and
there explained: the forms of government remaining
without change: the no change proposed other
than in the state of the representation of the people in the
Common House: the Monarch with the same prerogatives:
the Lords with the same privileges.

and, when compared
with the primeval state
of the government representation, even
this change a change
in details only, and
not in principle.

or 9 or 2
Of proposed operation
th for putting the change
misconception impossible: —
the same
as recommended by
Pitt in 1782 while
carrying on in Ireland
by Grey in
1794 quoting Pitt

The means operation by which if it depended upon
me the change would be produced have also been
explained, and beyond all danger it is hoped, of
misconception: the same that was approved and recommended
by the late Mr Pitt in the British House of Commons a little before he became
Minister of recommended for Great Britain
at the very time when they were carrying on
in and for Ireland: the same that were again recommended
by Mr now Earl Grey also in the House
of Commons, he referring at the same time to the
recommendation of given by Mr Pitt as above

or 10 or 3
If J.B. no more a
seditionist or republican,
then so they

If I am a seditionist and a republican, I am
as a seditionist I am the same sort of republican or seditionist
as other now as Mr Pitt and Mr Grey were then.

or 11 or 4
Not that they prove it
right, but they save it
from consistent refusal
from which I




Identifier: | JB/137/347/001
"JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 137.

Date_1

1820-01-12

Marginal Summary Numbering

or 8 or 1 - or 11 or 4

Box

137

Main Headings

radicalism not dangerous

Folio number

347

Info in main headings field

radical reform bill

Image

001

Titles

Category

text sheet

Number of Pages

1

Recto/Verso

recto

Page Numbering

c2 / c1 / d9 / e1

Penner

jeremy bentham

Watermarks

[[watermarks::[prince of wales feathers] i&m 1816]]

Marginals

jeremy bentham

Paper Producer

arthur wellesley, duke of wellington

Corrections

Paper Produced in Year

1816

Notes public

ID Number

47064

Box Contents

UCL Home » Transcribe Bentham » Transcription Desk