JB/143/097/001

Click Here To Edit

1824 Oct 20

Constitutional Code Rationale of Reward

Pensions of Retreat

(5)

29 Oct. This to
from, then cancelled.

If any body were punished for they
use would it be? Lord Eldon for doing it?
No: not I for taking it. What for
selling what is true? Oh yes: still may surely then if it were false. For if matchless single
taken the of brother is the pillar

Economy

Reason 2. Alledged Saving to the public is expected of sub the saving
Observation
Economy? if the such what charactered by
the it Saving at the spiggot, and betting
out at the laugh . Whatever saving For the only possible saving somebody<add>again on the making of his
case underneath of, on this ground see the just mentioned remedy. would from the system
Reason 3. The more you give the more you increase his responsibility<add>By what you th whatever you then</add> toward about for the f of efficient situation
and expence in shape being think
Observation, you add to it in one sum, but you <add></add>take it away in another minimized frugality maximized

His supposing in the event of his being punished is and, but the probability
of his being punished is diminished. Increase I will to a certain degree almost by
Reason 3. By addition made to the value of
capacity of being suffering punishment in this lightest of all shapes, you have
the and given to the responsibility
of the functionary. Functionaries might be there are whom for abuse of thispoint it would
be just as easy to punish in any way as to rian the thing that made
them. The bet would be no small one , In it would be contained all those
who as no otherwise punishable than by impeachment: both Houses occupied

[+] doubted not it indeed,
Over and over again he has
declared it from the Bench.
Has the time then ceased to be levied? not it indeed.
The Chancellor having
sanctioned it, the Court
of obeying has confirmed
it. day making
as if he had repeated then
all, the Chancellor of the Exchequer
For a state repeated some of
the Law Taxes did he include
was this money then? Not heit indeed.
Its not. Parliament can
repeal an act of Parliament:
it can not repeat and act
of Lord Eldon. His Majesty The King
can not do without him: a Chancellor who though he doubts of every thing sticks at nothing as not to be parted. give is an honour as honour not in
court
He has always had one Judge over him.
but that Judge has always
been himself. If his conduct
is inquired into: it is by him
that the inquiries are named.
As to the two joint legislation
in question, in Stat is making
for one of them: the other as
still enjoying a pension of
retreat. [+]
The proceeds after the that the the
for with nothing else. In no year are there ever months enough for
if a functionary of in taken in the aggregate
legislation: still less for legislation with judication upon the shoulders of it.
Was H of the public against deing in but shapeIf the convenient consisted himself<add>he was</add>guilty, noble Lord, would declare
after them because he was not. The charge was putting two thousand p
taken together is directly in the as the value of the pecuniary
public money into his own pocket. So I did quoth he. (see the Trust)
be the But
and if you ask me what I did with it I won't tell you Hisunpunishment
it has been shown and the direct but the
Those spite crime, this at is of course the last that English History will be was to be
sum in English History | Ao 1806 the highest man in the law, and the
| Diminuation next man under him created them
into a than Ca sort of a sham Court and levied upon such a the
set of taxes, the produce of which would sooner or later, find its way into the
Secty
Reason be a Comfort of the functionaries themselves
more p: this too in the very th of in that of Rudiments. If this is not corruption
themselves th whereby some quality and exemption for the form of
what is? When law Corruption or not corruption, it is because law. Who
has made it so? Lord Cha Chancellor under whom who lawyers still upon
apprehension ground do so the if less of subsistence in
Lord Eldon . The illegality of the tax was it among the objects of the doubts? [+]
the decline of life.

Observation

With Upon such rendered It is for the legislation to take care of the penalty : it is the individual proposes to himself the obtainment
of an official situation upon the described in the above placein because
to talk not of themselves

Identifier: | JB/143/097/001 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 143.
Date_1	1824-10-20	Marginal Summary Numbering	or 5 - or 6
Box	143	Main Headings	rationale of reward
Folio number	097	Info in main headings field	rationale of reward
Image	001	Titles
Category	text sheet	Number of Pages	1
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c5 / d5
Penner	jeremy bentham	Watermarks	j whatman turkey mill 1824
Marginals	jeremy bentham	Paper Producer	jonathan blenman
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1824
Notes public		ID Number	48730
Box Contents