JB/149/224/002

Click Here To Edit

Mr Ponsonby. It was no answer whatever to
this motion to say that they had now on
their table a Report on the subject by
a Committee of the Lords for the information
in that Report was miserably deficient.
It furnished no satisfactory reason for
the delay of justice in the Court of
Chancery. The Right hon. Gent. he said that
now has ascribed the delay to
the great increase of motions. In this he
completely differed from him. What was
the it that occasioned the great increase
of motions? simply this that as the
parties and sollicitors could not get
the opinion of the Court directly
upon the cause itself they were
glad to come at it by a side wind
in the way of motion. The increase
of motions therefore was the effect
of the delay and not the cause. The
true source of the evil, he maintained
was the delay to which the suitors
were subjected in getting their causes
heard by the Chancellor. The way in
which it was proposed to get rid
of them was this evil was the
appointment of a 3d judge – and
the right hon. Gent would have the

Identifier: | JB/149/224/002 "JB/" can not be assigned to a declared number type with value 149.
Date_1		Marginal Summary Numbering
Box	149	Main Headings	constitutional code
Folio number	224	Info in main headings field
Image	002	Titles
Category	copy/fair copy sheet	Number of Pages	4
Recto/Verso	recto	Page Numbering	c1 / / /
Penner		Watermarks	iping 1810
Marginals		Paper Producer	bernardino rivadavia
Corrections		Paper Produced in Year	1810
Notes public	[[notes_public::"to follow mr perceval" [note at top of sheet]]]	ID Number	50078
Box Contents